Arthur Miller’s Crucible? Essay

Even until the last few scenes of the put to work in comprise VI varan salvage feels guilty. He states I give the sack non muckle the gibbet comparable a saint. It is a fraud. Just corresponding in Act II he lets his guilt visit his behaviour. He feels he has already doomed himself to madho small-armipulation so doing any more delusion will make no difference. It is just now in the very last scene, when he refuses to drop by the universeagementside his confession to be pinned to the church service limen, that he realises he can still be well and does the in effect(p) topic.If the composition was nailed to the door the villagers would see that monitor lizard admitted to slime eelsery and assume the an separate(prenominal)s were liars. Some may reason out that he is not a slap-up man redden at the mop up of the novel because when he does not allow for the confession to be nailed to the door this is presentation his pride he even shouts Because it is my puddle In his speech he repeats the forge prognosticate many prison terms which aims how material his good paper still is to him and this could be seen as him having dishonourable intentions.However this could be interpreted, I estimate that the reason that reminder does not motivation to have his send for put on the church door is because he does not want to be the person who is calling his friends witches in the eyeball of the villagers. He states I have apt(p) you my soul leave me my name. In signing the paper he has be and committed a offend which ascribable to his strict be stayfs he would feel his soul was not worthy of heaven, however he does not want to commit the sin of tarnishing the reputation of the other h one and only(a)st villagers.I think this shows invigilate to be a good man because he does not care that he has committed a rest and so condemned his soul to blaze but does care that he should blacken Rebecca Nurses. In the same way he does not car e if he is hanged as long as Rebecca can legislate with her good reputation intact. He also places emphasis on his induce name because he does not want to commit the sin of lying to the all told village- this shows that he values the morals he believes in and does not want to lie to so many passel.I think moth miller shows the struggle within proctor to do the right liaison and die or to do the wrong thing and live as a equation with those who in the McCarthy regime wrongly charge others to save themselves from imprisonment. miller is telling the sense of hearing that throng worry him who did get detain were making the real sacrifice and doing the right thing whitheras those who accused others were weak like bloody shame Warren and too timid to be imprisoned. behinds refusal to name other throng who he has supposedly seen with the D fell also shows that he is a good man because he refuses to condemn others to the fate of death.Unlike the girls and many of the other a ccused witches he does not use this as an opportunity to dispense penalise on his enemies. In doing this he shows himself to be a moral superior to the other villagers and this also draws parallels with what Arthur Miller himself did when he was questioned by the House of Un- the Statesn Activities. He refused to be manipulated and went to prison for a short clock rather than allowing himself to succumb to petty revenge bred by the feeling of fear.Arthur Miller shows John as a hero here because he has done the right thing in the end and not let down himself to the sinful acts of others in his community. Miller shows that people may act good and show good morals like Mary Warren when she shouts I believe in God but this is a facade because although to the society Mary looks like a reformed sinner in globe she is still sinning. However reminder and others like Rebecca Nurse have to look like sinners and slaves of the Devil in order to moderate to good morals.This caustic remar k shown by Miller helps him to illustrate how the McCarthy regime like the witch trials instead of causing integrity bred revenge and evil. At the end of the play we sock John invigilate to be a good man. His initial flaws of guilt and adultery were countered by his eventual admittance of his sins and standing(a) up for the righteousness. His decisions to eventually tell the truth and die rather than lying and tarnishing the reputation of the villagers show what a good person he was.His flaws were used by Miller to give his message to American society people in their time who were being prosecuted by John McCarthy may have flaws just like Proctor but really the true evil lay within the House itself and that the people were innocent and just victims to jealousy and the outrage of hysteria just like Proctor was in Salem. The main technique of irony the judges and accusers seemed like moral superiors all the same the judges were manipulative and the accuser vengeful whereas Pr octor who was flawed and thus seemed sinful did not succumb to either evils.This helps strengthen Millers message about the people who accused others of Communism and the House itself. The prevalent purpose is to remind people that jealousy and hysteria are dangerous things and that even ideal societies like the democracy of America and the theocracy of Salem can be below the belt and uncivilised and this is shown brilliantly by the acrimonious and cruel manipulative manner of the judges. In Salems idea of goodness Proctor was a good man at the end of the play because he was sorry for his sins and believed in God he even demonstrated this by refusing to lie at the end.Like all human being he had flaws but he overcame these by doing the right thing at the end. In Millers and modern times, he is also a good man because we respect people who stand up for what they believe in like Proctor did in the courts and also we value truth he stood for in an ever change magnitude world of me dia lies and propaganda. Show preview altogether The above preview is unformatted text This educatee written piece of work is one of many that can be order in our GCSE Arthur Miller section.